Home Your basket
• Communication disorders m...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autistic like behaviour d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• The pedicled musculo-cuta...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lysis of the incus long p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Similarities between reti...
   Price 14.00 €
• A specific plain X-ray in...
   Price 8.50 €
• How to predict post thyro...
   Price 12.00 €
• Resorption of cartilage g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• When some clinical cases ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• The «neurological» velum ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• The three-stage frontal f...
   Price 14.00 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Meniere disease : news....
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parapharyngeal lymph node...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.00 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Myofibroma of the mandibu...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 369.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2003 o

OTOLOGY

When to suspect a perilymphatic fistula?


Authors : R. Bussières, D. Portmann, P. Noyon (Québec, Bordeaux)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,4:259-264.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: The diagnosis of perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is difficult since no single clinical situation gives the diagnosis for sure. The goal of this study is to clarify the clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF. Methods: Retrospective study of 20 patients that had an exploratory tympanotomy with a PLF confirmed peroperatively. An analysis of the symptoms, signs and complementary exams was done. The surgical findings and the postoperative evolution were noted. Results: 100% of patients reported a hearing loss, 80% vertigo, 70% a tinnitus and 35% equilibrium problems. Every patient had an etiological event to explain the PLF (trauma (85%), stapedotomy (10%), other ear surgeries. Five patients had a positive fistula or Vasalva test. All patients except one had an hearing loss on the audiogram ( sensorineural, mixte or conductive). 50% had a CT scan, 70% of which were abnormal. A VNG was done on 3 patients. The sites of the PLF were as follows: 90% oval window, 5% round window and 5% both windows. The hearing got better or was stabilised in 95% of patients after the operation. 64% saw an improvement of their tinnitus and 87% of their vertigo. Conclusion: The diagnosis of PLF is difficult and a high index of suspicion is mandatory. One must look for an etiologic situation to explain the PLF. The audiogram is almost always modified, a mixte hearing loss being common due to the high incidence of ossicular trauma associated with PLF. The clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF were identified as follows: An old trauma, a recent trauma, a history of otologic surgery particularly on the stapes and a preexisting hearing loss that aggravates. A diagnosis scale to evaluate the risk of PLF, based on clinical situations, physical exam and complementary exams was done to help the clinician in the evaluation of PLF.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE