Home Your basket
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Overlay versus underlay t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ossicular reconstruction ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic ossification in t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Efficacy of nasal irrigat...
   Price 15.00 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anterior cerebrospinal fl...
   Price 10.00 €
• Interest of the cervical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €
• Similarities between reti...
   Price 14.00 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Deafness in adults. Study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 267.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2004 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Transit time of swallowing after subtotal laryngectomy


Authors : M. De Vincentiis, P. Calcagno, P. Di Cello, R. Mastronicola, M. Simonelli, G. Ruoppolo, P. Cerro, A. Gallo (Rome)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,4:223-227.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: The aim of subtotal laryngeal surgery (Cricohyoidopexy= CHP and Cricohyoidoepiglottopexy= CHEP) is to create a simplified but functional neolarynx. The neolarynx permits the passage of air, the closure of the airway, and ensures phonation through the vibration of the cricoid and arytenoid mucosa; furthermore, it allows the recovery of swallowing, optimizing the closure of the neoglottis with the movement of the remaining arytenoids. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, on a long term basis, the efficiency of the swallowing function comparing swallowing times in CHEP and CHP with and without functional neck dissection (FND). Materials and methods: A radiological study was conducted on 48 patients selected from a group of 253, who underwent subtotal laryngectomies at the “G. Ferreri” Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics of the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. The selection of the 48 patients was carried out based on the following criteria: type of surgery, date of surgery (follow up of at least 12 months), patients who were not treated with radiotherapy before or after surgery, patients who were also examined with fibrolaryngoscopy and videofluoroscopy, patients not affected by motor deficits involving phonatory and swallowing regions (stroke, lesions of the central nervous system), negative follow up (no evidence of disease). The parameters for evaluating the functional recovery were the times the nasogastric tube and tracheotomy tube were kept in place. The functional recovery times of the groups thus formed were compared to one another. Through videofluoroscopy the authors evaluated oral transit times (OTT) and pharyngeal transit times (PTT) as parameters of deglutition. Results: The results consistently showed that swallowing time remains under one second as in individuals with normal swallowing functions. Conclusion: The study of deglutition times, conducted at least 12 months after surgery, does not show any substantial differences between CHEP and CHP with reference to pharyngeal transit and oral transit times.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE