Home Your basket
• Tinnitus: first symptom o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic anatomy of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Forcing the voice : the c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of the effects of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Silent Sinus Syndrome – T...
   Price 8.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed labyrinthine fist...
   Price 10.50 €
• Invasive cholesteatoma in...
   Price 10.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• CT scanning in "second lo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical Practice Guideli...
   Price 12.00 €
• An unusual fester of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The place of the myocutan...
   Price 10.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal sarcoidosis: Ca...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 334.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE