Home Your basket
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Soft palate ventilation: ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• BAHA in single sided deaf...
   Price 12.50 €
• Facial nerve outcome af...
   Price 12.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Seven cases of inverted n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• «Mini-rhinoplasty»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of radical (na...
   Price 10.50 €
• The verrucous laryngeal c...
   Price 5.50 €
• PET/CT in the management ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• These lesions of the voca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exploration of the swallo...
   Price 14.00 €
• Monolingualism, an overlo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Phoniatric management of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rejuvenation of the eye: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal forcing and posture...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audiological comparison b...
   Price 14.00 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 343.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2014 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis media and radical mastoidectomy: A single-stage procedure


Authors : Piché M, Côté M, Philippon D, Laflamme N, Bussières R.

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,4:175-180.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: We conducted a retrospective case review of patients with mastoid cavity and active or inactive chronic otitis media (COM) who underwent cochlear implantation and ear obliteration in a single-stage procedure. The objectives of this review are to assess the rates of complications and postoperative infections and to evaluate post-implantation audiologic perfor­mance. Materials and methods: All patients with COM and mastoid cavity, associated or not with active disease, who undergo cochlear implantation and obliteration of the ear as a single-stage procedure from November 2004 to April 2013, were included in the review. All the complications were recorded. Open-set sentence scores were used to evaluate the audiologic gain after implantation. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in our review: ten with active COM and seventeen with inactive COM. Overall, nine patients (9/27) presented post­operative complications (7/9 were minor): three were amongst active COM patients (30%) as compared to six amongst inactive COM patients (35%), which included the two major compli­ca­tions. A mean gain of 55.9% on open-set sentence scores was obtained after cochlear implantation. Discussion: We found that complications rate of the one-stage cochlear implantation was higher in patients with COM than in global implant population, but most complications were minors and there was no statistical difference between active and inactive COM. In addition, these patients had audiologic scores similar to those found in patients with normal temporal bone anatomy. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation performed as a one-stage procedure could be considered as an option of treatment to avoid staging in patients with active and inactive COM. Although these patients need a regular follow-up, they present good post-implantation audio­metric scores.

Price : 12.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE