Home Your basket
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Attention deficit disorde...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Epidermoid carcinoma of p...
   Price 10.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• External otitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroid carcinoma: di...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hygiene and sterilisation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteointegrated cranio-fa...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cranial fasciitis of chil...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 272.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2000 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Pharyngeal pouch surgery : a five year review


Authors : M. A. Siddiq, P. J. Patel (Walsall)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000;121,1:37-40.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : The treatment of pharyngeal pouch varies widely. Our aim was to establish current and recent practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in our department and set guidelines for future management. A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was performed with all data derived from patient notes. 28 procedures were performed on 24 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Over two thirds of these patients (68%) underwent an endoscopic procedure (stapling or diathermy) and the remainder underwent excision (14%), inversion (10%), cricopharyngeal myotomy (4%) or dilatation (4%). The primary diagnostic investigation performed was a barium swallow in 17 cases, but in 7 cases, referred by gastroenterologists, an oesophagogastroscopy was performed despite characteristic presenting features in all cases. The average inpatient stay was similar for endoscopic and excision procedures (5.5 and 5 days respectively), but longer for inversion procedures (9 days). This was influenced mainly by operative complications. 2 endoscopic stapling procedures were complicated by perforations and 1 patient developed hoarseness after an inversion procedure. The mean follow up time was one month at which stage all asymptomatic patients were discharged. 2 patients treated by endoscopic stapling and 1 patient treated by inversion complained of persistent symptoms and required further surgery. We conclude that endoscopic stapling was the commonest procedure used. Concerning future management, the use of nasogastric tubes after uncomplicated stapling procedures was abandoned. Also it was felt that large pouches should be treated by excision, small pouches by cricopharyngeal myotomy and the remainder by endoscopic stapling. The long-term evaluation of results was also deemed necessary.

Price : 5.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE