Home Your basket
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Going from the tube feedi...
   Price 8.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Dehiscence of the anterio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Quality of life after rad...
   Price 10.50 €
• Simple management of the ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Vestibular neuritis: Eval...
   Price 14.00 €
• Facial nerve monitoring d...
   Price 12.50 €
• When some clinical cases ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinolithiasis: Review ab...
   Price 5.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Reinforcing tympanoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• A protocol for post-opera...
   Price 5.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Personality study in prof...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal papillomatosis ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Floating stapes footplate...
   Price 12.00 €
• Evaluation of vocal abuse...
   Price 8.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 363.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2015 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Value of the preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction


Authors : Cortese S, Phulpin B, Mastronicola R, Gangloff P, Guillet J, Roch M, Julien L, Verhaeghe JL, Dolivet G. (Vandœuvre les Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2015;136,2:61-66.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: Reconstruction of the mandible with micro­vascularized fibula transplants is actually a well-established procedure, yet the major component is the limited diameter of the diaphysis that can induce oral rehabilitation’s failure, especially in dentate patients. In this paper, we report our surgi­cal procedure allowing preservation of the mandibular height. The primary objective was to assess aesthetic and func­tional improvements of preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: Five patients (all males, mean age of 60 years) were treated with this method. Aetiologies were tumour in 3 cases, and osteo­radionecrosis in the two others cases. We described all step of our surgical procedure and the functional, aesthetic and carcinologic results were evaluated. The follow up varies from 6 to 30 months. Results: One patient died at 12 days from unre­la­ted affection. For the other patients, both the aesthetics and functional outcomes were better than in case of mandibular interruption surgery. In fact, the mandibular contour of the mandibule was preserved and the height of mandible was restored. One patient is in progress of dental rehabilitation with osseous implants. Carcinologically, no local recurrence was observed. Conclusion: This technique is reliable and enables to optimize oral rehabilitation with endosteal implants. Nevertheless, we consider that the 3D scanner is essential before the intervention to evaluate the osseous reach. Moreover, if necessarily the procedure can be modified intraoperatively.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE