Home Your basket
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pathophysiology, assessme...
   Price 12.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• The complications of end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Orbital Kimura’s disease:...
   Price 14.00 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Observational study to as...
   Price 14.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The ENT in operations … T...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment failures in ben...
   Price 10.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma presenting ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Blepharoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otomycosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study of anal...
   Price 14.00 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otoplasty: Special attent...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis management of W...
   Price 10.50 €
• These lesions of the voca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Drop weld thermal injurie...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 392.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE