Home Your basket
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Temporomandibular dysfunc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• Hearing results in stapes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pneumoparotid: a case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic resection of s...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Morphodynami...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Granular cell tumours (Ab...
   Price 8.50 €
• A post-styloid mass revea...
   Price 12.50 €
• Paranasal sinus mucoceles...
   Price 14.00 €
• Videonystagmography and v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Acoustic recognition of e...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Choanal atresia : a retro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Percutaneous gastrostomy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rehabilitation strategies...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Resorption of cartilage g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric endoscopic sin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinico-radiological cons...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation in clinical pr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dynamic palatography: Dia...
   Price 12.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Analysis of the possibili...
   Price 8.50 €
• Preliminary experimental ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Signs of upper Airways di...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vision preference in dyna...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the parot...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transsexualism: From diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• The domes crossover: A ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interstitial brachytherap...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 658.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2006 o

RHINOLOGY

Comparison of radical (nasalisation) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study


Authors : R. Jankowski, D. Pigret, F. Decroocq, A. Blum, P. Gillet (Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,3:131-140.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To compare the 5-year outcomes of two endoscopic surgical approaches for diffuse and severe nasal polyposis. Study design: A natural experimental situation gave us the opportunity to compare the results 5 years after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalisation) (n= 39), and functional ethmoidectomy (n= 37). The two surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons on 76 consecutive patients. There was no random assignment for this retrospective study. Methods: Five years after surgery, the criteria for comparison were 1) functional results based on a questionnaire using visual analogue scales in patients free of revision surgery; 2) endoscopic and CT-scan assessments of anatomical results. The CT-scans were blinded and randomized, and opacities were measured using a computerized model; 3) the recurrence rate of nasal polyps. Results: Five years after surgery, the overall nasal functional benefit was scored 8.41 ± 0.40 (mean ± SEM) after nasalisation, and 5.69 ± 0.83 after ethmoidectomy P= 0.002) in patients free of revision surgery. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was methodically scored according to a pre-defined scale. Results were significantly better in the nasalisation group (6.03 ± 0.7 versus 3.27 ± 1.0, P= 0.02). A good correlation was found between the endoscopic and CT-scan scores (r= -0.78, P= 0.0001 for nasalisation, and r= -0.65, P= 0.001 for ethmoidectomy). The total recurrence rate was 22.7% in the nasalisation group, and 58.3% in the ethmoidectomy group (c2= 10.41, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in the treatment of nasal polyposis complete ethmoidectomy leads to better long term results than incomplete ethmoidectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE