Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adaptation and validation...
   Price 10.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• The effects of treatments...
   Price 14.00 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous perforation i...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mucormycosis – early diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• The value of the operatin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of ma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cataract surgery and its ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Navigation in head and ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transsexualism: From diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cleft palate and otitis m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bone anchored hearing aid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Granular cell tumours (Ab...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prosthetics gains and sat...
   Price 12.50 €
• The ultra-low resistance ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 366.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE