Home Your basket
• Botulinum toxin and rejuv...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervicofacial cellulitise...
   Price 10.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 14.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Moderate leukocyte infilt...
   Price 10.50 €
• These lesions of the voca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recent advances in surger...
   Price 5.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vision preference in dyna...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• An original case of laryn...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lifting of the oval face ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sarcoidosis of the thyroi...
   Price 12.50 €
• The uses of computer-assi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Clinical signs and correl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bell's palsy: treatment b...
   Price 5.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 386.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE