Home Your basket
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of senti...
   Price 10.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Influence of phonetic con...
   Price 10.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bronchogenic cyst of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relationship between ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution of the study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dermatofibrosarcoma protu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Meniere disease : news....
   Price 10.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary carcinoma arisi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Universal hearing screeni...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Scaling properties of the...
   Price 5.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous cartilaginous ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical Practice Guideli...
   Price 12.00 €
• Liposarcoma of the hypoph...
   Price 5.50 €
• The lymphoepithelial carc...
   Price 5.50 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 357.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2003 o

OTOLOGY

When to suspect a perilymphatic fistula?


Authors : R. Bussières, D. Portmann, P. Noyon (Québec, Bordeaux)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,4:259-264.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: The diagnosis of perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is difficult since no single clinical situation gives the diagnosis for sure. The goal of this study is to clarify the clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF. Methods: Retrospective study of 20 patients that had an exploratory tympanotomy with a PLF confirmed peroperatively. An analysis of the symptoms, signs and complementary exams was done. The surgical findings and the postoperative evolution were noted. Results: 100% of patients reported a hearing loss, 80% vertigo, 70% a tinnitus and 35% equilibrium problems. Every patient had an etiological event to explain the PLF (trauma (85%), stapedotomy (10%), other ear surgeries. Five patients had a positive fistula or Vasalva test. All patients except one had an hearing loss on the audiogram ( sensorineural, mixte or conductive). 50% had a CT scan, 70% of which were abnormal. A VNG was done on 3 patients. The sites of the PLF were as follows: 90% oval window, 5% round window and 5% both windows. The hearing got better or was stabilised in 95% of patients after the operation. 64% saw an improvement of their tinnitus and 87% of their vertigo. Conclusion: The diagnosis of PLF is difficult and a high index of suspicion is mandatory. One must look for an etiologic situation to explain the PLF. The audiogram is almost always modified, a mixte hearing loss being common due to the high incidence of ossicular trauma associated with PLF. The clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF were identified as follows: An old trauma, a recent trauma, a history of otologic surgery particularly on the stapes and a preexisting hearing loss that aggravates. A diagnosis scale to evaluate the risk of PLF, based on clinical situations, physical exam and complementary exams was done to help the clinician in the evaluation of PLF.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE