Home Your basket
• Partiturogram: (New) tool...
   Price 10.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pre-Congress of the Ameri...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Association of Bezold’s a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Detection and role of hum...
   Price 14.00 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Relevance of Choukroun’s ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal polyposis: long ter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• The complications of end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral cochlear implan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinitis and allergy test...
   Price 8.50 €
• Periphery, central and ps...
   Price 10.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pyogenic granuloma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rehabilitation strategies...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Navigation in head and ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eagle’s syndrome: A case ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Liposarcoma of the hypoph...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 325.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2004 o

AUDIOLOGY

The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss


Authors : M. A. Kiliç, F. Ögüt (Izmir)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,1:35-38.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: to determine whether speaker gender affects speech discrimination scores, in normal hearing and simulated high frequency hearing loss situations. Materials and Methods: listeners were twenty normal volunteers. The speech stimuli were eight phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists, uttered by a male and a female speakers. These lists were low-pass filtered at 1500, 2500 and 3500 Hz’s to represent high frequency hearing loss. To obtain speech discrimination scores, the subjects listened to each of the eight lists in a different filtering and talker conditions in a randomized order. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: in normal hearing situation, the scores obtained by male and female speeches, were similar (p=0.60). On the contrary, statistically significant differences were observed in all of the three high frequency hearing loss situations (p<0.01). Conclusion: Female speech is significantly more difficult to discriminate than male speech in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss and probably in patients with high frequency hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE