Home Your basket
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tracheal post-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• The three-stage frontal f...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.00 €
• Nasosinusal tumours: Anat...
   Price 14.00 €
• Mucoepidermoid carcinomas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• Presentation of a prototy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new technique for the u...
   Price 5.50 €
• Arteriovenous haemangioma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• MIF in Head and Neck canc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otoplasty: Special attent...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• CT scan, MR imaging and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the anterio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Temporary loss of visual ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 345.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2015 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Value of the preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction


Authors : Cortese S, Phulpin B, Mastronicola R, Gangloff P, Guillet J, Roch M, Julien L, Verhaeghe JL, Dolivet G. (Vandœuvre les Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2015;136,2:61-66.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: Reconstruction of the mandible with micro­vascularized fibula transplants is actually a well-established procedure, yet the major component is the limited diameter of the diaphysis that can induce oral rehabilitation’s failure, especially in dentate patients. In this paper, we report our surgi­cal procedure allowing preservation of the mandibular height. The primary objective was to assess aesthetic and func­tional improvements of preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: Five patients (all males, mean age of 60 years) were treated with this method. Aetiologies were tumour in 3 cases, and osteo­radionecrosis in the two others cases. We described all step of our surgical procedure and the functional, aesthetic and carcinologic results were evaluated. The follow up varies from 6 to 30 months. Results: One patient died at 12 days from unre­la­ted affection. For the other patients, both the aesthetics and functional outcomes were better than in case of mandibular interruption surgery. In fact, the mandibular contour of the mandibule was preserved and the height of mandible was restored. One patient is in progress of dental rehabilitation with osseous implants. Carcinologically, no local recurrence was observed. Conclusion: This technique is reliable and enables to optimize oral rehabilitation with endosteal implants. Nevertheless, we consider that the 3D scanner is essential before the intervention to evaluate the osseous reach. Moreover, if necessarily the procedure can be modified intraoperatively.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE