Home Your basket
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary sub-mandibular gl...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otomycosis due to Scopula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Air rifle pellet injury t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Zoom of the ENT French So...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rejuvenation of the eye: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Correlation between the r...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Analysis of the possibili...
   Price 8.50 €
• Brain stem cavernous angi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Drop weld thermal injurie...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Multidisciplinary daytime...
   Price 12.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Simple management of the ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Detection and role of hum...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Innovations in interventi...
   Price 15.00 €
• Epistaxis and hospitalisa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Percutaneous gastrostomy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Why is allergic rhinitis ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral spontaneous cho...
   Price 10.00 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Skull vibratory test in p...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 406.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2017 o

OTOLOGY

Anatomy of the external auditory canal. Comparative study of microscope versus endoscope


Authors : Ayache S, Beltran M, Guevara N. (Cannes, Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2017;138,3:93-98.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: Over the past several years, ear endoscopy has evolved from an additional procedure to microscopy to an exclusive trans external auditory canal surgical technique. This study reports the results of an anatomical study of the external auditory canal and compares microscope and endoscope in transcanal visualization of the tympanic membrane. Design: Retrospective patient series. Setting: Tertiary and secondary case referral centers. Participants: Consecutive patients ful filling the inclusion criteria of the study. Main outcome measure(s): Comparison between microscope and 0° rigid endoscope in transcanal visualization of the tympanic membra­ne in the clinic setting. Total and partial visualizations of the tym­pa­nic membrane and study of anatomical features of the bony external auditory canal are described. Results: Of 5000 patients (10,000 ears), rigid endoscope provided total visua­li­zation of the tympanic membrane in 83% versus 10% of ears with microscopic approach. Various anatomical narrowing of the bony external auditory canal are described as well as their effects on visualization of the tympanic membrane through the transcanal endoscopic and microscopic approaches. Conclu­sions: With a «tunnel» view, the microscope can be limited for a total visualization of the tympanic membrane through the external auditory canal. The tip of the endoscope can help the surgeon to overcome some narrowing of the ear canal, provi­ding a «conical» view of the tympanic membrane. Examination under the microscope may give partial vision of the tympanic membrane. This exposure is certainly better under general anesthesia where you can force without risk of pain for the patient. In contrast, the endoscope offering a conical vision allows in a lot more cases to see the eardrum in its entirety. This is interesting to consider a trans canal surgery whether under a microscope or endoscope.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE