Home Your basket
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinico-radiological cons...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant osteoma of the maxi...
   Price 8.50 €
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otosclerosis among patien...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cranial fasciitis of chil...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of mandi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Multidisciplinary daytime...
   Price 12.00 €
• Optimizing vocal efficien...
   Price 8.50 €
• The velum: 5th tap of spe...
   Price 14.00 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otomycosis due to Scopula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Phoniatric management of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effects of pregnancy ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgery for hyperthyroidi...
   Price 5.50 €
• External versus endoscopi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign tumors of the nasa...
   Price 14.00 €
• Type III ossiculoplasty w...
   Price 5.50 €
• Assessing efficacy of voi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal tracheal post-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 356.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Diagnosis of submandibular gland tumours: A compa­ri­son of CT and ultrasound


Authors : Uzomefuna V, Ohakim A, Pennycooke K, Sheahan P. (Dublin)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:201-205.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: This study aims at determining whether CT is superior to ultrasound in providing more accurate information in the investigation of submandibular gland tumours. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out between 2005 and 2010. Thirty-five (35) patients who presented with sub­mandibular gland swelling and had diagnostic ultrasound or CT/MRI prior to surgery and histological examination of tissues removed at surgery were investigated to determine the correlation between radiologic diagnosis and histologic diagno­sis. Results: CT was used in the pre-op assessment of 22 patients, 12 of which had correct diagnosis when compared with the histology findings while ultrasound was used in pre-op assessment of 13 patients, 12 of which concurred with the histo­logical diagnosis. With regards to ability to detect malignant lesion, ultrasound had much higher sensitivity than CT and comparable specificity. Therefore, in this study, ultrasound provided a better guide in the pre-op radiologic assessment of submandibular gland swelling. Conclusion: Our evaluation of pre-operative diagnosis of CT and ultrasound in the assessment of submandibular swellings reveal that ultrasound is better in determining the nature of the lesion.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE