Home Your basket
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Wegener granulomatosis mi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rehabilitation strategies...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Persistent stapedial arte...
   Price 5.50 €
• The velum: 5th tap of spe...
   Price 14.00 €
• The rehabilitation of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assessment of migraine re...
   Price 8.50 €
• Dynamic palatography: Dia...
   Price 12.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• Influence of the relapse ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epitympanic osteoma of th...
   Price 12.50 €
• Comparative study of anal...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Deafness in adults. Study...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 312.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2014 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis media and radical mastoidectomy: A single-stage procedure


Authors : Piché M, Côté M, Philippon D, Laflamme N, Bussières R.

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,4:175-180.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: We conducted a retrospective case review of patients with mastoid cavity and active or inactive chronic otitis media (COM) who underwent cochlear implantation and ear obliteration in a single-stage procedure. The objectives of this review are to assess the rates of complications and postoperative infections and to evaluate post-implantation audiologic perfor­mance. Materials and methods: All patients with COM and mastoid cavity, associated or not with active disease, who undergo cochlear implantation and obliteration of the ear as a single-stage procedure from November 2004 to April 2013, were included in the review. All the complications were recorded. Open-set sentence scores were used to evaluate the audiologic gain after implantation. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in our review: ten with active COM and seventeen with inactive COM. Overall, nine patients (9/27) presented post­operative complications (7/9 were minor): three were amongst active COM patients (30%) as compared to six amongst inactive COM patients (35%), which included the two major compli­ca­tions. A mean gain of 55.9% on open-set sentence scores was obtained after cochlear implantation. Discussion: We found that complications rate of the one-stage cochlear implantation was higher in patients with COM than in global implant population, but most complications were minors and there was no statistical difference between active and inactive COM. In addition, these patients had audiologic scores similar to those found in patients with normal temporal bone anatomy. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation performed as a one-stage procedure could be considered as an option of treatment to avoid staging in patients with active and inactive COM. Although these patients need a regular follow-up, they present good post-implantation audio­metric scores.

Price : 12.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE