Home Your basket
• Congenital anomalies of n...
   Price 14.00 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of radical (na...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Larynx manipulation....
   Price 5.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-operative evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oropharyngeal reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chyle leak after cervical...
   Price 15.00 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paranasal sinus mucoceles...
   Price 14.00 €
• Paediatric endoscopic sin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of the otology ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal polyposis and olfac...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of children wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vocalab: A new software f...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arteriovenous haemangioma...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 372.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2000 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Pharyngeal pouch surgery : a five year review


Authors : M. A. Siddiq, P. J. Patel (Walsall)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000;121,1:37-40.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : The treatment of pharyngeal pouch varies widely. Our aim was to establish current and recent practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in our department and set guidelines for future management. A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was performed with all data derived from patient notes. 28 procedures were performed on 24 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Over two thirds of these patients (68%) underwent an endoscopic procedure (stapling or diathermy) and the remainder underwent excision (14%), inversion (10%), cricopharyngeal myotomy (4%) or dilatation (4%). The primary diagnostic investigation performed was a barium swallow in 17 cases, but in 7 cases, referred by gastroenterologists, an oesophagogastroscopy was performed despite characteristic presenting features in all cases. The average inpatient stay was similar for endoscopic and excision procedures (5.5 and 5 days respectively), but longer for inversion procedures (9 days). This was influenced mainly by operative complications. 2 endoscopic stapling procedures were complicated by perforations and 1 patient developed hoarseness after an inversion procedure. The mean follow up time was one month at which stage all asymptomatic patients were discharged. 2 patients treated by endoscopic stapling and 1 patient treated by inversion complained of persistent symptoms and required further surgery. We conclude that endoscopic stapling was the commonest procedure used. Concerning future management, the use of nasogastric tubes after uncomplicated stapling procedures was abandoned. Also it was felt that large pouches should be treated by excision, small pouches by cricopharyngeal myotomy and the remainder by endoscopic stapling. The long-term evaluation of results was also deemed necessary.

Price : 5.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE