Home Your basket
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• The expanding domain of i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stuttering and Tourette’s...
   Price 5.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lipoma of the floor of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Head and neck reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Non-traumatic nasal septa...
   Price 8.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sphenochoanal polyp: Repo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Giant form of infantile m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Social integration 15 yea...
   Price 14.00 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Vestibular neuritis: Eval...
   Price 14.00 €
• Bilateral cleft lip and c...
   Price 14.00 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 320.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE