Home Your basket
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Optimizing vocal efficien...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Primary sub-mandibular gl...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €
• Allergic rhinitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• The relationship between ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Herniation of the temporo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical surgical emphyse...
   Price 5.50 €
• ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role of [18]-FDG PET/CT i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Thyroid differenciated ca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cataract surgery and its ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long-term results of faci...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Is ethmoidal adenocarcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 337.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2013 o

OTOLOGY

Cochlear implantation in older patients: Outcomes and comparisons


Authors : Rafferty A, Tapper L, Strachan D, Raine C. (Bradford)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,3:119-124.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (CIs) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) question­naires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model. Results: 80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater partici­pa­tion in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful. Discussion: Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (CIs) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of CIs in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE