Home Your basket
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transsexuality: Speech th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic scale for eval...
   Price 8.50 €
• Polypose nasosinusienne a...
   Price 15.00 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Isolated congenital trach...
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Deafness in adults. Study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Balloon catheter dilatati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Advantages of combined th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the efficie...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ENT in operations … T...
   Price 5.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reinforcing tympanoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autistic like behaviour d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Contribution of the study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otosclerosis among patien...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Turner syndrome audiologi...
   Price 12.00 €
• Role of diffusion weighte...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 325.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands: Prognostic significance of immunohistochemestry. A study of 49 cases


Authors : Santini L, Coulibaly B, Gaudart J, Turner F, Michel J, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:183-187.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is consi­dered as the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Its prognosis is dominated by the presence of high-grade forms involving life-threatening. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry to identify the most aggressive forms and allow better discrimination between low grade, intermediate grade and high grade tumors. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 49 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Two immunohistochemical markers have mainly been studied: a marker of proliferation (Ki-67) and a growth factor receptor (EGFR). Additional analyzes were performed with other markers (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2). Statistical analy­sis investigated the existence of a correlation between the pre­sen­ce of these factors and the histopathological grade on one hand and survival of patients on the other hand. Results: Regarding the results of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and EGFR, it was observed a better survival rate when the immuno­staining was less than 10%. The expression of Ki-67 and EGFR was correlated with the histological grade, but did not, in our study, allow discrimination between low-grade, intermediate grade and high grade. Our results are consistent with data of the literature, including Ki-67, which appears to be a useful but not powerful marker of prognosis of MEC. Other markers studied (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2) showed no contri­bu­tory results. Conclusion: The prognosis of MEC is appre­ciated satisfactorily following histological criteria: histological grade, surgical margins, perineural invasion or vascular emboli. The integration of immunohistochemistry in a thera­peutic algorithm could be particularly useful for the challen­ging assessment of prognosis of intermediate grades.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE