Home Your basket
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The ENT in operations … T...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Airbag and hearing loss: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mandibular reconstruction...
   Price 8.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pre-Congress of the Ameri...
   Price 8.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Which face lift for which...
   Price 14.00 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of rhinologic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical anatomy of the f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Invasive cholesteatoma in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical surgical emphyse...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 316.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE