Home Your basket
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hygiene and sterilisation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare case of sarcoidosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal tracheal post-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic-assisted retro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Delayed labyrinthine fist...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation in clinical pr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Head and neck reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• The value of the operatin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new case of osseointegr...
   Price 12.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Quality of life after rad...
   Price 10.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• A sphenoidal mucocele wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 372.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE