Home Your basket
• Predictive factors for su...
   Price 15.00 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• Teratoma of the parotid g...
   Price 5.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of head and nec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Primary sub-mandibular gl...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Myringoplasties for anter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Influence of phonetic con...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life before an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroid carcinoma: di...
   Price 5.50 €
• Papillary carcinoma arisi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Medial displacement of T-...
   Price 8.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Retropharyngeal abscess i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Deafness in adults. Study...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Myofibroma of the mandibu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Morphodynami...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exploration of the swallo...
   Price 14.00 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 389.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE